bones
| | | it does give a biggger boost to the gold but still gives even distribution for four through fifteen. the medals get more and the rest get some. is everyone happy now????
|
|
Kristopher
| | |
Ibanez
| | | Looks like a good compromise - except Silver should be 17 otherwise it's bigger jump from Bronze to Silver than Silver to Gold! |
|
Vega
| | | Silver should be 17. Looks good |
|
Vega
| | | oh oops. sorry Ibanez, I didn't see your post |
|
bones
| | | yeah i just saw that. i meant to put 17. so do we all agree??
|
|
Sz
| | |
Vega
| | | aesthetical reasons ...... that's pretty funny Sz. Yes you are right we have concluded on the 'compromise option' #14.
1-15 will look like this. (not considering ties of course).
1. 121
2. 116
3. 112
4. 109
5. 107
6. 105
7. 103
8. 101
9. 99
10.97
11.95
12.93
13.91
14.89
15.87
With a tie, I suppose that would mean some of the Bonus points ranking would be skipped? So if #1-5 have the same time, 6-10 have the same time, and 11-15 have the same time, wouldn't that mean that 1-5 would get the gold bonus, 6-10 would get the silver bonus, and 11-15 would get the bronze bonus? And nobody would get the bonus points for #4-#15? So it would look like this?
1. 121
2. 121
3. 121
4. 121
5. 121
6. 116
7. 116
8. 116
9. 116
10.116
11.112
12.112
13.112
14.112
15.112
16. 85
17. 84
18. 83
Etc.....
But actually looking at it now, that doesn?t seem right bcuz the way it works now is if there are ties, the points just continue where they left off. So actually it would look like this?
1. 121
2. 121
3. 121
4. 121
5. 121
6. 116
7. 116
8. 116
9. 116
10.116
11.112
12.112
13.112
14.112
15.112
16. 109
17. 107
18. 105
19. 103
Etc......
|
|
Kristopher
| | |
mike flips
| | | Yea Kris...
but i think its attached to the times... so fastest time (or any ties) = 121, second fastest = 116
but ya this looks good
|
|
Ibanez
| | | Go for it - I just hope I stay in the top 50 after this!! |
|
bones
| | |
bones
| | | also sz let us know if you change something in it. |
|
bones
| | | well if it stays the same i will get 131 bonus points. |
|
Vega
| | | Sz - just wondering when option #14 will be implemented. Also, I was wondering if the points per level completed will show as 100 for gold or 121 for gold. I think it's best to have it be 100 and then have a separate calculation for each player for their bonus points. Is that possible? Perhaps one challenge will be that the points need to be appropriately applied to each level pack so they can't just be tacked on to the general TTC total points. But since I am not sure how your calcuations and systems are put together, I don't really know how difficult these types of changes will be. Maybe it can say 100 + 21 BP for gold, 99 + 17 BP for silver, etc etc... and then the level pack totals can say like 2300 points + 150 BP = 2450 total points. This way we can see the difference that the bonus points make for each player that earns them. Just wondering
-Vega |
|
Sz
| | | now when "arcade reality" is released i can finally come back to BoD!
so the ranking will be probably changed tomorrow, along with other delayed issues like levelpacks and the BoD bugfix |
|
mike flips
| | | Should we also have bonus points for placing top 3 in a pack??? Or maybe the same bonus can be applied to the pack rankings? And then overall rankings???
So if you are 10th in the pack, you also get the amount of BP 10th place gets on a level???
Yes or no? |
|
Vega
| | | If you rank top 3 in any pack, that means you already have a mad amount of BP for that pack because you will get BP for every level that put you in the top 3 |
|
bones
| | | dont forget silver is seventeen and.... my option was picked.YES i am in bod history forever. i am so glad.......crap vin will shoot so far ahead of me. that sucks. |
|
Sz
| | |