Bike or DieHall of FameSubmitLevelsForum

Showing
Tools
Showing  All Countries
Pick a country...
Golden Club
Pages: 1...10 ...20 ...130 ...138
#1 mike flips283315 days
#2 Andrew A195217 days
#3 BikerBrian116843 days
#4 Vega104360 days
#5 Laser93909 days
#6 Kristopher74645 days
#7 Kamirashi67703 days
#8 Spence67442 days
#9 Kenn46779 days
#10 Tabs45265 days
 
517 comments on 52 pages: <<<< 1 2 ... 38 39 40 ... 51 52 >>>>
Sz
Scoring: Each day you own a gold medal gives you one point.
 
Sz
under the original scoring rules only the first person having the best time could get max points, new players had no way to get a good score in bottle, so this level was excluded from the competition. now you get equal points for equal score and the bottle is back

however there is still only one gold medal and only one golden club point in a level... so perhaps bottle-type levels should be excluded from golden points scoring. what do you think?
3 Dec 2008, 20:33
Vega
Sz - I think that ranking should be equal as well. I'm sure that it's annoying to have matched the gold time and yet be ranked #68. Ties should be ties. But I'll admit that it can get complicated. The main problem with this is in medal distribution (since there can only be 3 medals per level). In that case, I think "first come, first get" is the best scenario.

For the 2 bottle levels, I agree with having the GC points stripped since they are not truly earned.
3 Dec 2008, 21:00
BikerBrian
I think we need to consider removing Triangles for the same reason. There is some chance, given enough time, that it may bottle up someday.

Seriously though, I would pay money to have triangles removed.
3 Dec 2008, 21:28
mike flips
First come first serve is fine for medals. The rationale is that if the level is not deemed a bottle, a faster time can be achieved. It may get frustrating in heavily played levels that are very short but that is something we just have to live with.

But for sure, take away GC points for the bottle levels. Id even remove them from competition just because it messes the graph. Clearly they were not HOF worthy levels and in hindsight we can rectify the mistake.
3 Dec 2008, 21:35
mike flips
Plus, i would suggest that we take away all golden club points earned from the time that the second person achieved the score. So Rachman would earn golden club points in Bottle from Nov 2004 until Feb 2005.

I dont think it is fair to remove the points from the beginning because the originators, especially in bottle, did put in some effort and should be rewarded. So for the time period that they were the only person with the bottled time, they had an original score and should receive points.
3 Dec 2008, 21:44
Mr.pickle.
hmm.. a litttle complecated mike..

I like them to count for points, but I am fine with them not counting for GC.

lol Biker Brian, Triangles isent that bad...after youv tried it around 9000 times..
3 Dec 2008, 21:47
Vega
i'm pretty much inline with everything mike said
3 Dec 2008, 21:57
Xuzz
Hey guys:

I agree with mike on the Bottle GC points, but about the ranking chart, why doesn't that just use the "Real Rank" (like casey's pages?)? That should work for everyone .

also, for the future, we should have a "temp" HoF system where the pack is in the HoF, but not counted for GC or TTC for a week or so. Then we can spot and fix bottles before it is really released. However, the times for non-bottle levels in the new pack would be transfered when it is officially released (so you keep your games for all the non-bottle levels). Good idea ?
3 Dec 2008, 23:31
PMD
My vote:

1) Go with Real Rank in the 'Rank Distribution' graph
2) Give the 'Finder' of a bottle path 100 GC points for their effort.
3) Remove all GC points earned(except for the finder's points) from bottle levels.

Alternate option for #2: Give them GC points until 10 people (or some other number) have matched the time.

We are only talking it about 2 levels and 2 people that it really effects at the moment and they don't even play anymore (that we know about). So, it is not like we will be hurting their feelings.


4 Dec 2008, 1:21
Vega
Besides Rachman and DavidKing were 2 of the top players in their day. I am sure that they are not interested in collecting eternal GC points on these bottle levels. I know for sure I wouldn't be interested. I want to earn the points... that way nobody can ever question it. If they get upset, that would very weird.
4 Dec 2008, 2:26
You could comment if you were logged in.
©2008 Szymon Ulatowski @ TOYSPRING