Head to Head

(United States, San Francisco)  Xuzz Submitted: View solo Time: 0:59,78 Player's comment: First game under a minute.

BikerBrian (United States, Tennessee) Submitted: View solo Time: 0:59,64 Player's comment: Second game under a minute

Level 13 - Jump or Die

0:00

BikerBrian 19 27 16		As Xuzz mentioned, there is room for improvement. I got a slow start, but kept playing. A perfect game could shave another minute off of the gold time (Xuzz was a minute ahead at the top flag). However, I'm sure everyone will agree that playing BoD perfectly for one minute is hard to do.
Vega 15 10 8		These are both excellent runs. I see maybe room for a high 58.xx, but it's really pushing it at this point. It truly would take "playing BoD perfectly for a minute" on a very active map, which is no easy task.
Laser 10 18 9		Sorry Brian, but I don't believe you're good enough to shave a minute off of this level. Maybe I could have done it back in the day...
BikerBrian 19 27 16		Laser, you crack me up. If you could have (back in the day), why didn't you? I didn't say I was even going to attempt to shave a minute off. I was simply stating that a perfect game would be in the 58 range.
Vega 15 10 8		Brian - He's referring to the impossibility in your faux pas above above "shave another minute off of the gold time".
BikerBrian 19 27 16		Thanks for clearing that up, Vega. It would help if I proof read my posts. I see now that shaving a "minute" off the gold time would mean finishing before you start. Of course, Laser could've done it back in the day.
Laser 10 18 9		I bet Lee could've done it.
Vega 15 10 8		If anyone could do it, Lee could.
Xuzz 5 7 7		I'm going to pull a pickle here and claim 45.xx. (Anyway, more seriously: I see 56-57 as perfection, not 58.)
Mr.pickle.		hey thats me! ^~^

You could comment if you were logged in.